Two quotes I think are related to the posts on 'bloodless abstraction' and 'cultural relativism'. More later..
"The problem of what is man is always therefore the so-called problem of 'human nature' or that if so-called man in general'. It is thus an attempt to create a science of man (a philosophy) which starts from an initiallt 'unitary ' concept, from an abstraction in which everything that is 'human' can be contained. But is the 'human' a starting point or a point of arrival, as a concept and as a unitary fact? Or might not the whole attempt, in so far as it posits the human as a starting-point, be a 'theological' or 'metaphysical' residue?" (Gramsci)
'Assume man to be man and his relationship to the world to be a human one: then you can exchange love only for love, trust for trust.' (Marx)
4 comments:
Welcome back!
Thanks John. In case you didn't know, my url was somehow nicked.
That's so strange. Do you know how it happened?
Not really. Some kind of hackery? Have now made the password trickier.
Post a Comment